Friday, March 5, 2010

David Brooks Is Spot-on Regarding the Tea Partiers and the New Left

From David Brooks' column in today's New York Times:
[B]oth the New Left and the Tea Party movement are radically anticonservative. Conservatism is built on the idea of original sin — on the assumption of human fallibility and uncertainty. To remedy our fallen condition, conservatives believe in civilization — in social structures, permanent institutions and just authorities, which embody the accumulated wisdom of the ages and structure individual longings.
That idea was rejected in the 1960s by people who put their faith in unrestrained passion and zealotry. The New Left then, like the Tea Partiers now, had a legitimate point about the failure of the ruling class. But they ruined it through their own imprudence, self-righteousness and na├»ve radicalism. The Tea Partiers will not take over the G.O.P., but it seems as though the ’60s political style will always be with us — first on the left, now the right.
Thank you, Mr. Brooks. I've longed for someone to make clear the distinction between real conservatism and the destructive radical version we have masquerading as conservatism today.

We need more David Brookses.

No comments: