data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e867/4e867ae513960895744d27a6dc33ed94bd8c6328" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83c9d/83c9d83e41a9dc3745fee0d128691c8a11415d11" alt=""
Nearly every magazine is finding ways to produce special issues or to slap Jackson's photo on the cover of their regular issues. Samir Husni notes that Time's special edition devoted to Jackson (with a bumped-up cover price) was produced in
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abd04/abd049a4ccb793b524c321fa4b8cf1d84918b51a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b118e/b118efa7c6bfa5ca97348c72b89dfbe6cb84eefd" alt=""
Of course, had Jackson not died at the same time as actress Farrah Fawcett, then she would be dominating the newsstands these days. At least In Touch Weekly did a quick split cover, featuring both recently deceased celebrities. Competitor People had the better cover photo of Jackson, but it relegated Farrah to a corner box.
Jackson probably will sell better, so in that important way, there are probably few dry eyes in
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ac6/e2ac61b4514848100a2b59fee9bfab279ccaa951" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment